2024Integrated annual report

Our sustainable development model

ARM is committed to responsible and sustainable mining and beneficiation, with zero tolerance for harm to employees, contractors, host communities and the environment.

The board is the foundation of the corporate governance system and is accountable for ARM’s performance, which includes sustainable development. It ensures the company’s long-term strategy and purpose are implemented sustainably and that business is conducted ethically and with integrity.

The board has delegated responsibility to the ARM social and ethics committee to monitor and report on the manner and extent to which the company protects, enhances and invests in the wellbeing of the economic, The board is the foundation of the corporate governance system and is accountable for ARM’s performance, which includes sustainable development. It ensures the company’s long-term strategy and purpose are implemented sustainably and that business is conducted ethically and with integrity.social and environmental contexts in which we operate to ensure that our business practices are sustainable. The committee is chaired by Dr RV Simelane and comprises five non-executive board members.

ESG risks and sustainable development matters and performance are included in the enterprise risk management (ERM) process. ERM forms part of the formal agenda of the management risk and compliance committee, a subcommittee of the audit and risk committee.

The ARM executive: sustainable development operates with oversight from the social and ethics committee and develops, implements and reviews sustainability policies, standards, strategies and targets to ensure these align with the board’s commitment to responsible corporate citizenship. She also attends board meetings to respond to any sustainability-related matters raised by the board. The risk department reports on risk-related matters, which include ESG matters, under the oversight of the finance director.

The effectiveness of our approach to sustainable development is assessed through key performance indicators and related matters that are regularly monitored at operational, divisional, executive and board levels. We also monitor related information from engagements with our key stakeholders. The combined assurance model (see page 112 of the ESG report) provides a sound basis for evaluating the appropriateness and reliability of ARM’s sustainability processes, controls and information.

Divisional and operational governance frameworks

In ARM Ferrous, the Assmang social and ethics committee oversees the sustainability performance of the operations, except for Machadodorp Works. Quarterly meetings ensure comprehensive reporting at operational level. The committee is chaired by the ARM executive: investor relations and new business development.

Sustainable development committees for the ARM Platinum operations report to the executive committee or board of the respective joint ventures, as appropriate. These committees are chaired by the ARM executive: sustainable development.

The committees report on sustainability-related performance and compliance to the ARM social and ethics committee at quarterly meetings.

Sustainability performance in F2024

Performance indicator as at 30 June Assured F2024 F2023 F2022 F2021 F2020
Economic and related core baseline indicators (segmental)            
Sales (Rm)   11 418 14 662 38 208 44 564 27 370
Taxes (Rm)   1 608 3 469 4 817 6 506 2 805
Headline earnings (Rm)   5 080 8 983 11 338 13 064 5 534
EBITDA (Rm)   1 049 5 829 17 839 24 321 11 009
Number of environmental administrative penalties/fines   1
Employee indicators (100% basis)            
Total number of ARM employees and contractors1   23 369 22 931 21 610 20 928 20 998
– Employees (permanent)   13 670 13 477 12 707 12 335 12 678
– Contractors (mainly used in capital projects)   9 699 9 454 8 903 8 593 8 320
Employee turnover (excluding contractors) (%)   7.4 6.5 5.2 10.1 6.3
Investment in employee training and development            
– Total expenditure (Rm)   399 371 198 239 225
– % of payroll   8.8 9.3 7.1 6.9 6.8
Employment equity (% previously disadvantaged groups per category)            
– Top management   73 75 67 65 61
– Senior management   70 66 64 57 52
– Professionally qualified   78 76 73 69 68
– Technically qualified   86 84 82 80 79
Safety and health            
– Total work-related fatalities 1 1 2 2 2
– Fatality frequency rate (FFR)2 0.004 0.005 0.010 0.010 0.010
– Lost-time injury frequency rate (LTIFR)2 0.22 0.27 0.31 0.41 0.45
– Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)2 0.50 0.62 0.70 0.81 0.92
– Reportable/serious accidents   43 44 42 55 63
– Total occupational diseases submitted for compensation 24 15 13 18 19
– Total number of cases of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) submitted for compensation 23 15 13 18 11
– Total number of new pulmonary TB cases3 19 21 18 34 46
– Employees and contractors receiving antiretroviral treatment at ARM operations   1 320 1 239 1 398 2 575 3 168
Number of lost man-days due to industrial action   110
Environmental indicators            
Total volume of water withdrawal (m3) 24 503 219 21 274 743 17 393 796 20 034 604 21 773 441
– Total operational water withdrawal (m3) (municipal, surface and groundwater)   23 253 064 18 291 911 16 803 679 19 380 928 18 967 229
– Other managed water/diversions (m3)   1 250 155 2 982 832 590 117 653 676 1 300 439
Water output (m3)   2 508 616 733 063 242 836 866 552 1 045 647
Total energy used (GJ)4 7 400 278 7 693 348 7 577 456 8 444 099 8 642 520
Energy use            
– Electricity (MWh) 1 330 731 1 331 182 1 380 623 1 542 908 1 563 311
– Diesel (000 litres) 78 433 79 213 71 241 78 853 82 572
Emissions            
Carbon emissions (equivalent tonnes CO2) (100%)            
– Scope 1 and 2 1 695 526 1 804 578 1 879 449 2 016 832 2 060 511
– Scope 3 56 402 411 59 402 936 * * *
Direct emissions            
– NOx (tonnes)   391 374 366 372 398
– SOx (tonnes)   234 249 257 263 274
– Particulate matter (tonnes)   311 213 276 290 267
Corporate social responsibility            
Total CSI and LED spend (Rm) 189.0 123.9 150.4 170.4 130.3
– CSI (Rm)   53.1 41.4 34.6 45.2 44.7
– LED (Rm)   135.9 82.5 115.8 125.3 85.6
ARM BBEE Trust (Rm) (projects)   23.2 33.16 19.8 10.9 14.5
Governance indicators            
ARM’s King IV application register Y Y Y Y Y
Board diversity            
– Diversity (black) (%)5   60 56 56 56 58
– Gender (female) (%)   20 22 25 25 25
– Independent non-executive directors (%)   80 67 63 63 56

Non-financial data is stated on a 100% basis.
1  Total number of ARM employees and contractors as at 30 June.
2  Injury rates are measured per 200 000 man-hours and include both ARM employees and contractor incidents.
3  Reported for the 12 months to December in line with the regulatory reporting requirements.
4  Total energy used was assured for the first time in F2022.
5  Excludes non-South African director.
6  Restated to correct prior misstatement
Limited assurance provided by KPMG Inc.
*   Not reported.